Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '16 at 18:24
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 128
2-Core 244
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 623
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
EVGA(3842 6284) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 140
Parallax 124
113% 134 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 132
Splatting 104
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 374
Write 363
Mixed 366
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 30.9
105% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 102
95% 150 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB-$299
105GB free
Firmware: EXT42B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.7% Above average
Read 261
Write 179
Mixed 184
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 21.3
97% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 73.5
80% 136 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
909GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 129
Write 111
Mixed 115
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.17
90% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
78GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 46.1
Write 45.6
Mixed 45.4
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.38
92% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 43%
Lexar LRWM04U 32GB
27GB free, PID b053
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 33
Write 26
Mixed 18.5
31% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.59
64% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,224
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback