Performance Results

Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop 80%
Workstation 28%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 8SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R3  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 13:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 366
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 127E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.1% Below average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 55
Parallax 42.9
41% 49.3 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 47.2
36% 43.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 775 751 751 749 751 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 938
Write 1,202
Mixed 944
SusWrite 782
218% 966 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 53.5
176% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 757
576% 783 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 175%
Great: 204%
Hkvsn HS-SSD-C100/480G 480GB
336GB free
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 413 408 407 406 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 453
Write 415
Mixed 328
SusWrite 408
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 21.6
95% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 34.6
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 86D3 SP008GBSFU266B02 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.1% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R3 Builds (Compare 1,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R3

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback