Default string

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 24%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 11:39
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 70.2
25% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 102
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 113
8% 113 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 0.04
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Power 128GB 128GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0407A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 179 184 184 185 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
Read 310
Write 180
Mixed 143
SusWrite 179
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 7
41% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 68.2
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 48.7
56% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 123456789012345678 8GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical string Builds (Compare 4,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop 74%
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $245
The Best.
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i3-10100F $120Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback