Sony SVP13213SGS

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Sony SVP13213SGS (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	69%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 61.8 1-Core 58.5 2-Core 62.8 41% 61 Pts	4-Core 53.9 8-Core 55.9 7% 54.9 Pts	64-Core 55.3 3% 55.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 90B6) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 1.19 1% 1.08 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.39 2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 128GB 740 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM6401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 188 180 179 163 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 888 Write 388 Mixed 374 SusWrite 178 100% 457 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 29.7 115% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 140 136% 223 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 131%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 788GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 116 120 114 120 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 69.5 Write 51 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 115 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.1 108% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 16GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1 1.2 1.9 2.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Read 1.8 Write 1.2 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 1.6 2% 1.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 10.9 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.3 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony SVP13213SGS

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)