MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 08:30
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
39.5% Below average
SC Int 72.6
SC Float 44.3
SC Mixed 54.7
46% 57.2 Pts
QC Int 276
QC Float 163
QC Mixed 205
49% 215 Pts
MC Int 287
MC Float 166
MC Mixed 200
33% 218 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$170
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 118
Reflection 128
Parallax 186
44% 144 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 122
Splatting 81.4
44% 102 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44%
Great: 48%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$93
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 234 226 260 267 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 444
Write 336
Mixed 307
SusWrite 240
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 21.7
76% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 105
94% 146 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 125%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$73
35GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 112 136 119 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 121
SusWrite 118
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 99 92 78 72 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 83.6
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 85.1
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 7.1 6.6 7 6.4 6.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 56.4
Write 1.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 6.1
15% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 24%
Integral Neon USB 3.0 16GB-$14
8GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 26 26 7 21 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 10
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 19.3
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 870A-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $183
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $366Nvidia GTX 1070 $379Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $119Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $666SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $100SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback