Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$298 381,041 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	82.3% Excellent	1-Core 130 2-Core 239 88% 184 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 674 71% 556 Pts	64-Core 677 46% 677 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$280 752,541 User benchmarks, average bench 57% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Lighting 230 Reflection 199 Parallax 210 60% 213 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 213 Splatting 167 58% 174 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 61%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$100 32,892 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 470 Write 374 Mixed 398 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 43.2 151% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 154 123% 175 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FA 2x16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled	45% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 507,744 samples	3,005x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $97Bench 111%, 442,547 samples	2,419x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 200%, 171,000 samples	557x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $58Bench 84%, 285,104 samples	1,943x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $59Bench 71%, 57,239 samples	1,152x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 72%, 33,337 samples	1,070x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $1,176

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24