Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 34.6 31% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 37.3 8-Core 42.5 5% 39.9 Pts	64-Core 44.5 3% 44.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 115 40 65 40 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 59.8 Mixed 35 SusWrite 68 42% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 119GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 47 71 68 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 82.3 Write 84.8 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 67.4 55% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 109%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 917GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 25 23 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 34.3 Write 26 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 24.1 36% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1 212% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 3.8 13% 4.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16