Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '19 at 02:09
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 198 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 729 67% 559 Pts	64-Core 1,017 63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372C) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.0 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Lighting 33.8 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 34.5 28% 31.3 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 33.8 Splatting 32.7 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 413 Write 423 Mixed 335 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 22.9 90% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 154 126% 185 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 5GB free Firmware: UJ450000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 408 Write 256 Mixed 289 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 16 69% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 82.2 DQ Mixed 40.3 46% 80 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 110GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 69 60 59 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 53.2 Write 69.1 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 69.4 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 60%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 124GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 73 73 72 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 11.8 Write 41.3 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 71.8 25% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 43%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 225GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 58 57 58 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 57.1 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 56.8 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 118GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 102 79 69 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 134 Write 102 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 98.7 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 58GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 109 109 112 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 66.9 Write 38.5 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 109 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 2x8GB 2,922 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 31 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 33.3 SC Mixed 26 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)