Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '19 at 23:48
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145 466,002 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 207 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 679 70% 550 Pts	64-Core 837 56% 837 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$170 521,268 User benchmarks, average bench 57% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1763 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.9% Average	Lighting 164 Reflection 179 Parallax 226 43% 190 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 167 Splatting 130 47% 146 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$75 1,805 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 166 93 151 164 173 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 498 Write 452 Mixed 381 SusWrite 179 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 33.7 118% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 192 188% 296 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 106%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 50,738 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 367GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 106 107 107 107 106 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 67.2 Write 110 Mixed 51 SusWrite 105 61% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 190% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 9,612 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 68%, 116,366 samples	134x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 78%, 466,002 samples	67x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $149Bench 68%, 79,414 samples	60x

GPU
RX 580AMD $170Bench 57%, 521,268 samples	61x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $145Bench 31%, 603,361 samples	59x
RX 570AMD $137Bench 49%, 258,328 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 64%, 196,784 samples	35x
A400 120GBKingston $25Bench 59%, 99,987 samples	30x
SU650 240GBAdata $49Bench 67%, 25,125 samples	12x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C17 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 369 samples	14x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 92,103 samples	12x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 12,461 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290	Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $42

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28