Asus 1015PX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.83%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1015PX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015PE
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 22:05
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom N570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.83% Terrible
SC Int 21.9
SC Float 7.2
SC Mixed 10.9
11% 13.3 Pts
QC Int 55.6
QC Float 22.5
QC Mixed 33
8% 37 Pts
MC Int 56.2
MC Float 23.2
MC Mixed 33.6
6% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$45
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 80 91 92 79 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 174
Write 116
Mixed 126
SusWrite 81.5
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 18
60% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 28.9
24% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 73%
Generic Flash Disk 66GB
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 4.3 7.7 8.3 8.6 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Read 15
Write 2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.2
8% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback