HP h9-1110eo

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP h9-1110eo (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140509
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 519 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 368.81 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 76.9 Reflection 78.2 Parallax 66.9 63% 74 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 70.7 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0809 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 178 178 180 176 176 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 416 Write 188 Mixed 218 SusWrite 179 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 16.7 79% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 57.3 61% 101 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 26GB free Firmware: HP13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 160 175 98 63 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 175 Write 135 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 117 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 361GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 63 62 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 50.8 Write 51 Mixed 20 SusWrite 62.9 34% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1110eo Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: HP h9-1110eo

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	6x

GPU
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples	3x
RX 560AMD $500Bench 22%, 60,738 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	3x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	2x
28MAM-1J1 128GBMtfddak1Bench 53%, 208 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GBHynixBench 49%, 50 samples	4x
HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 12GBHynixBench 49%, 11 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16GBMicronBench 48%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16