Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 406
39% 323 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2010 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 77
48% 69.5 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 57.5
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 44 2.2 88 9 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 470
Write 343
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 86.1
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 92%
Gigabyte NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$60
108GB free
Firmware: E8TM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 212 154 133 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 165
Write 200
Mixed 356
SusWrite 157
50% 219 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 37.1
107% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 137
107% 146 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 153%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
219GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 72
Write 70.8
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 62.2
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
239GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 46 48 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 47.7
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
228GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 97 97 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 50.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 97.8
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 90.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 96.3
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 14.1
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback