PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111102 |
Uptime | 4 Days |
Run Date | Apr 15 '19 at 19:11 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
68%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 61 38 37 66 73 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$55
40GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 61 61 60 61 MB/s
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 580x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 548x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 500x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 282x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 158x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 139x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 139x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $255 |