Intel X79F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79F  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 15:04
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0-$71
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.8% Average
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 139
50% 105 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 411
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 516
35% 516 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$200
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Lighting 105
Reflection 81.3
Parallax 135
28% 107 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 86.8
Splatting 84
24% 76.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 27%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.04E05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 19 59 60 63 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 56.2
Write 45.7
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 53.1
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 9905403-001.A 99P5471-002.A Kingston 99U5471-002.A 99P5471-002.A 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X79F Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 49%
Desktop 54%
Workstation 52%

Motherboard: Intel X79F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $221
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $55
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $288Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $603SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback