ECT One Gamestar PC Titan Z

Performance Results


Gaming 138% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 142% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	ECT One Gamestar PC Titan Z (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '19 at 12:47
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Memory 96.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 299 100% 182 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 1,052 95% 797 Pts	64-Core 1,616 100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8669) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	139% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 225 Parallax 216 172% 218 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 213 Splatting 145 102% 119 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 609GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1657 1738 1063 1746 1808 1806 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,188 Write 1,199 Mixed 776 SusWrite 1,636 271% 1,200 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 39.8 131% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 59.7 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 88.9 80% 117 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 425%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB 2,430 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1GB free Firmware: 1.0.00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 65.5 Write 89.2 Mixed 57.3 53% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 28.8 101% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 42.7 SC Mixed 30 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 52.2 77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical One Gamestar PC Titan Z Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 151%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

System: ECT One Gamestar PC Titan Z

CPU
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	2x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	1x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBIntel $190Bench 217%, 33,949 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 5,028 samples	1x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $810

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16