Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 02:44
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 113
50% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 280
31% 246 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 53.6
48% 58 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 62.7
Splatting 64.2
52% 64 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 316 334 332 326 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 381
Write 309
Mixed 267
SusWrite 326
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 30.4
100% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 134
105% 151 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
86GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 244 280 267 259 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 299
Write 249
Mixed 166
SusWrite 259
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 25.6
91% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 221
168% 228 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
86GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 103 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 99.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 101
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01D3LF4GB26826813 Samsung M378B2873FHS-CF8 V01D3LF4GB26826813 Samsung M378B2873FHS-CF8 10GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 1.4
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback