Lenovo 07634NB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 07634NB (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO INVALID
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070215
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '16 at 05:02
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2250 487 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 45.8 1-Core 14.1 2-Core 24.5 21% 28.1 Pts	4-Core 24.5 8-Core 28.9 4% 26.7 Pts	64-Core 28.2 2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK1234GSX 120GB-$55 815 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: AH00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1627 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 957 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1338 (0A) Spinup retry count 118 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 897 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2002 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 72 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 17156 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 274878627895 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 66 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1230 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 336 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	17.1% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 29 Mixed 28.1 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.15 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 18%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 6GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 9.97 Mixed 11.4 16% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.03 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.75 89% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 38%
SRT USB 16GB 568 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 6.22 Mixed 7.56 11% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.12 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.002 16% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.8% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.1 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.8% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 07634NB

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)