Supermicro X8DTN+-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemSupermicro X8DTN+-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTN+-F
Memory36.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.8% Average
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 124
42% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 468
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 1,033
69% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 8.1
2% 8.23 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 6
2% 5.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$39
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 98 2.7 36 116 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 232
Write 197
Mixed 166
SusWrite 82.5
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 10.3
49% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 28.7
39% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 55%
LSI MR9260-4i 1.5TB
906GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
Read 251
Write 13.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 14.3
16% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
18% 4 MB/s
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
220GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 139 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 148
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 139
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 114 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
63% Good
Read 107
Write 98
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 112
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
972GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 72
SusWrite 75.3
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 136 139 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 135
Mixed 73
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 40GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X8DTN+-F Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Supermicro X8DTN+-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $221
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback