Mustek Mecer_X102

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMustek Mecer_X102  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SKTH, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 124
62% 98 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Zotac(19DA 2047) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 0.88
2% 2.94 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 49 55 49 61 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 95.8
Write 89.1
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 46.3
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
46GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 43.8
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 66.2
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 40%
WD Elements 2TB
36GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 20.2
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 11.2
26% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
30GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 11.3
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 44%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
45GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.7 3.9 3.9 5.1 7.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 20%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
32GB free, PID ab31
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 25 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 25.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 25.6
33% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
28GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 22.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 11.5
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mecer_X102 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Mustek Mecer_X102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback