Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48% Average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 29.7 2-Core 56.7 39% 54.8 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 142 15% 121 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0724A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 222 Write 197 Mixed 5.8 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 6.37 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 96.8 DQ Mixed 1 17% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 97%
APPLE SD Card Reader 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 8403 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.94% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 5.3 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.3 8% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 39% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 16%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 14GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 22.2 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 19.5 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4850ATIBench 8%, 695 samples	13x
Mobility Radeon HD 5850AMDBench 7%, 1,228 samples	2x
Radeon HD 4850ATIBench 9%, 1,032 samples	2x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $377

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16