PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170-K (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150717 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 14 '19 at 10:05 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6600K-$111
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
52.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 72 69 70 71 69 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
472GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 105 106 107 106 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
291GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 109 110 110 110 MB/s
|
65.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
1923, 1923 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1,096x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $111Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 537x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 355x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 332x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 268x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $755 |