Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '19 at 05:26
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 570
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 29.6
30% 31.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38
Splatting 35.4
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 157 160 156 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 472
Mixed 403
SusWrite 189
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 60.8
208% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
11GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 77 77 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 68.5
Write 69
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 76.2
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
49GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 76.5
Write 71
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 93.3
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
379GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 73 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 80.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 71.9
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $761
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback