PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock P67 Pro (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110622 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Apr 13 '19 at 23:52 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 27,297,114 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 193 206 207 198 198 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
383GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 135 128 132 134 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 143 144 145 141 140 MB/s
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.5 5.3 5.5 MB/s
|
5.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.3%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 6x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples | 6x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 4x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 13% - Very poor | Total price: $31 |