Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '19 at 22:12
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 120 55% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 323 34% 274 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 29 Parallax 39 32% 35.5 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 34 29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 121 120 117 117 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48% Average	Read 272 Write 130 Mixed 166 SusWrite 118 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 22.6 79% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 94.5 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 86.7 75% 109 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 982GB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 111 113 111 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 72 SusWrite 111 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 162 165 162 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 150 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 162 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 182 182 182 181 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 161 Mixed 52 SusWrite 181 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 61GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 129 129 128 128 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 166 Write 138 Mixed 44 SusWrite 127 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 107%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 5TB free Firmware: RT18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 172 173 172 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 76.3 Write 116 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 169 71% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 0.7 264% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 769GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 132 128 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 114 Write 125 Mixed 20 SusWrite 130 130% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11.3 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16