Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Performance  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime24.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 12:11
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 494
46% 385 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.5% Above average
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 6.12
71% 62.2 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 45
23% 25.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 83 120 102 71 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 129
Write 10
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 90.8
13% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 4.6
40% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 0.2
40% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 78%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
16GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 48 70 34 62 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 138
Write 164
Mixed 182
SusWrite 56
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 16.7
74% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 168
114% 137 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
96GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 142 147 147 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 154
Write 170
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 145
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
47GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 148 147 152 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 143
Write 119
Mixed 72
SusWrite 147
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
44GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 60
Write 59
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 61.2
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $819
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback