Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X399-A  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 06:52
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$470
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.2% Very good
1-Core 109
2-Core 223
78% 166 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 892
82% 668 Pts
64-Core 2,480
166% 2,480 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 402
Reflection 393
Parallax 405
125% 400 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 389
Splatting 224
123% 280 fps
Poor: 76%
This bench: 124%
Great: 140%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1791 1762 1731 1755 1754 1764 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,615
Write 1,890
Mixed 1,063
SusWrite 1,760
409% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 70.1
241% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 788
600% 813 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 323%
Great: 359%
Amd-raid SanDisk Ultra II 480GB
434GB free
Firmware: X413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 291 293 288 286 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 334
Write 402
Mixed 292
SusWrite 292
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 20.5
62% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 99.4
85% 118 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 87%
Amd-raid CT500MX50 500GB
397GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 272 270 268 274 273 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.1% Good
Read 393
Write 417
Mixed 370
SusWrite 267
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 24.6
88% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 143
118% 165 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%
Amd-raid Array 3 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 369 368 375 380 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 72.3
Write 180
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 365
40% 174 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 3.7
14% 5.93 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 11.2
8% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 98%
Amd-raid ST4000DM004-2CV1 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 135 140 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 59.3
Write 112
Mixed 31
SusWrite 136
61% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.3
170% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 96%
Amd-raid ST3000DM001-1CH1 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 96 96 98 95 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 50
Write 54
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 93.5
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 48.6
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 2,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,537
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback