Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '19 at 20:52
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 162 71% 118 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 382 41% 325 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.3% Poor	Lighting 26.3 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 21 22% 24.6 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 29.6 24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GB 3,087 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200L00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 273 248 254 189 201 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.4% Above average	Read 201 Write 167 Mixed 166 SusWrite 231 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 14.5 53% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 211 180% 264 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 930GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 185 186 173 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 149 Write 168 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 183 97% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 22,760 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 19.9 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	680x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	539x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	101x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	206x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	248x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	221x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16