Asus V-P8H61E.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus V-P8H61E. (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK V-P8H61E.
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120504
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 166 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 346 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 55 52 50 55 53 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.5% Below average	Read 218 Write 68.5 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 54.5 22% 103 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 23.2 84% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 42.6 DQ Mixed 37.9 28% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 332GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 31 27 34 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 24 Write 42 Mixed 26 SusWrite 32.6 23% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 63%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 868GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 132 132 134 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 130 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 132 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM2L16BC4R1-B0AS 2x4GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical V-P8H61E. Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P8H61E.

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	18x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	14x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	13x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GBMicronBench 49%, 153 samples	7x
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	5x
CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 16GBCorsairBench 43%, 92 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16