Dell Studio 1535

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	0.52% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell Studio 1535 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0H279K
Memory	1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081204
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '19 at 08:32
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5750-$99 2,050 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 23 2-Core 44.9 30% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 45.3 8-Core 45.9 6% 45.6 Pts	64-Core 46 3% 46 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: X412 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.2 6.2 5.8 6 6.4 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	0.52% Terrible	Read 2.3 Write 7 Mixed 4 SusWrite 6.1 1% 4.85 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 18GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 17.2 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 15.8 25% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 2.7 192% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 39%
Generic USB Flash Disk 4GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.4 5.4 5.5 5 5.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Read 9.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 5.1 7% 6.03 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio 1535 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1535

CPU
Core2 Duo T8100Intel $78Bench 35%, 2,639 samples	6x
Core2 Duo T5750Intel $99Bench 32%, 2,050 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T5850IntelBench 32%, 471 samples	3x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATIBench 1%, 7,025 samples	17x
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	4x
CS1311 120GBPNY $63Bench 75%, 12,393 samples	2x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	3x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16