Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI GENE  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '19 at 22:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 60
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 182
60% 110 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 267
39% 287 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 850A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1747 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.2% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 71.7
58% 75.4 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 65.9
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 158 59 57 50 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 321
Write 301
Mixed 294
SusWrite 81
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1.1
47% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 1.1
46% 107 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 86%
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74
100GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 157 172 170 173 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 288
Write 171
Mixed 198
SusWrite 163
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 28.6
102% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 137
120% 179 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1347 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $133

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $547
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback