Asus M3N-HT DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M3N-HT DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090330
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9850 2,080 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 65.6 40% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 113 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 22.6 Parallax 17.6 16% 20 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 20.1 Splatting 21.2 18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 86 89 91 93 92 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.8% Average	Read 216 Write 181 Mixed 152 SusWrite 87.7 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 29.6 102% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 38.7 38% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 106%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 627GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 58 58 59 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 83.6 Write 60.3 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 57.7 47% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 89 91 93 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 58.2 Write 20.4 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 88.7 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.3 106% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 72%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 318GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 74 80 82 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 88.9 Write 81.8 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 75.9 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 100%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 74 80 82 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 111 Write 104 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 76 66% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 100%
WD WD5000AAKB-00H8A0 500GB 1,191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 41GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 55 55 55 54 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 61.2 Write 63.1 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 54.3 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 46%
WD Elements 1TB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 750GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.3% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 7.8 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 10.8 12% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.3% Great: 68%
WD Elements 500GB 559 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 88GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 24.7 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 11.1 16% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 61%
Seagate Desktop 3TB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 167GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 25 Write 25.1 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 10.1 27% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 21%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 626GB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Read 25.6 Write 21.7 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 9.3 25% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 502GB free, PID a00b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 31 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 31.8 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 31 39% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3N-HT DELUXE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N-HT DELUXE

CPU
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	5x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 470NvidiaBench 16%, 5,537 samples	3x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x
Vertex 4 256GBOCZ $400Bench 91%, 12,355 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16