Alienware Area 51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Area 51  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0XDJ4C
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '19 at 12:54
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 142
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 242
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 045D) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 22.2
12% 17.8 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 17.9
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 61 67 62 64 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 96.3
Write 98.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 66.2
21% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 17.5
73% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 149
126% 189 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 95%
OCZ-AGILITY3 240GB
39GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 90 118 128 129 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 94%
Toshiba MK6476GSX 640GB-$299
70GB free
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 44 44 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 43.3
Write 45
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 44.3
27% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 3 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 17.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area 51 Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Area 51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback