Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 2530p (NN359EA#AK8) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30E1
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '19 at 10:47
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo L9600 105 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Memory 59 1-Core 28.1 2-Core 51.5 32% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 55.3 8-Core 58.1 8% 56.7 Pts	64-Core 59.8 4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30E1) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.38 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.43 fps	MRender 0.33 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.61 0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA1M080G2LE 80GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 69 70 76 78 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 190 Write 78.8 Mixed 106 SusWrite 72 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 7.4 44% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 78.2 DQ Mixed 86.2 75% 113 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16