Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181005
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '19 at 02:59
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 79.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 224 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 678 69% 558 Pts	64-Core 840 52% 840 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.1 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.6% Average	Lighting 60.3 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 86.8 49% 72.3 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 57.3 50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte UD PRO 512GB-$47 3,305 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 132 98 118 178 199 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 507 Write 456 Mixed 385 SusWrite 156 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 36.9 131% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 185 186% 299 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 104%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 354GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 96 75 75 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	38% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 92.5 Mixed 48 SusWrite 83.4 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 13,006 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	79x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	57x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	25x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	9x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16