Biostar X370GT7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardBiostar X370GT7  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190107
Uptime22 Days
Run DateApr 09 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69% Good
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
74% 157 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 680
67% 533 Pts
64-Core 1,085
73% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 64-$400
CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 279
Reflection 228
Parallax 480
81% 329 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 304
Splatting 289
82% 259 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 104%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$85
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 477 417 453 501 501 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 2,051
Write 499
Mixed 644
SusWrite 471
200% 916 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 43.3
151% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 480
378% 525 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 182%
Great: 321%
Crucial M500 960GB-$223
203GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 288 284 275 276 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 413
Write 392
Mixed 316
SusWrite 281
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 29.1
101% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 184
175% 274 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79%
Great: 101%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
715GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 299 311 314 311 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 470
Mixed 448
SusWrite 309
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 49.5
162% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 105%
Great: 135%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
968GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 95 96 97 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 72.8
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 95.5
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
21GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 74.2
Write 75.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 72.9
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3733 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 33.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 29
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 122%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X370GT7 Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $408
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback