Asrock X370M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '19 at 20:16
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 234
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 784
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2312 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.62
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 82.2
Parallax 79.1
65% 80.2 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 78.2
65% 79.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 430 429 431 432 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,727
Write 1,524
Mixed 1362
SusWrite 468
284% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 68.5
235% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 790
589% 783 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 205%
Great: 228%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
169GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 212 207 218 211 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 401
Write 250
Mixed 278
SusWrite 210
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 38.8
150% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 265
202% 274 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
518GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 65
Write 24
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 22
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
298GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 103 101 99 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 100
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 82%
WD Elements 1TB
215GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 105
Write 90.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.9
114% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 35.4
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370M-HDV Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback