Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770-$340
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80% Excellent
SC Int 110
SC Float 113
SC Mixed 112
89% 112 Pts
QC Int 425
QC Float 390
QC Mixed 392
91% 402 Pts
MC Int 595
MC Float 589
MC Mixed 603
89% 596 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$164
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Lighting 235
Reflection 197
Parallax 213
70% 215 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 220
Splatting 176
80% 186 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$165
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 178 189 177 148 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 461
Mixed 346
SusWrite 208
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 38.1
149% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 180
167% 258 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$83
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 146 146 148 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 165
Write 98.1
Mixed 85
SusWrite 147
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$41
285GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 138 138 137 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 168
Write 116
Mixed 101
SusWrite 140
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
899GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 123 122 121 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 119
Write 101
Mixed 78
SusWrite 124
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$89
769GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 160 158 161 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 193
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 160
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Disk drive 1TB
650GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 70 71 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
Read 68.3
Write 64.8
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 71
74% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 12,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $794
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback