Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 21:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770-$340
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
SC Int 109
SC Float 116
SC Mixed 112
90% 112 Pts
QC Int 375
QC Float 413
QC Mixed 400
90% 396 Pts
MC Int 593
MC Float 594
MC Mixed 604
90% 597 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$163
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Lighting 229
Reflection 195
Parallax 209
68% 211 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 218
Splatting 174
78% 182 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$165
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 231 203 235 140 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 465
Mixed 343
SusWrite 202
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 43.3
158% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 177
167% 260 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 151 145 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 170
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 148
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$43
285GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 137 142 143 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 162
Write 124
Mixed 93
SusWrite 141
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
899GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 112 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 116
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$60
769GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 159 159 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 188
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 160
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Disk drive 1TB
650GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
Read 80.8
Write 62.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 70.9
75% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 12,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $816
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback