Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090914
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 21:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
31.7% Below average
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 101
35% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 177
12% 177 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 38%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 64 60 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 10.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 59.7
17% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $43
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback