HP HPE-570f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP HPE-570f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110321
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 18:02
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 93.6
50% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 278
29% 233 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6262) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 62.8
60% 69.7 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 69.4
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 256GB-$419
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 68 68 67 69 59 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 155
Write 102
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 69.2
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 12.3
53% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 17.6
13% 18 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 115 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 117
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
115GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.5
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback