Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 664
66% 541 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 6.16
0% 10.6 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 12.9
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 28 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 22.7
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 22.4
12% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 71%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
359GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 63 66 62 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 61.1
52% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Kingston 9905711-007.A00G 8GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.5% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback