Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 94.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 419 56% 422 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.1% Good	Lighting 73.6 Reflection 88.8 Parallax 151 60% 105 fps	MRender 82.6 Gravity 103 Splatting 124 87% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 260 253 147 191 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 456 Write 336 Mixed 240 SusWrite 192 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 25.7 96% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 135 113% 168 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 246GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 336 340 362 361 360 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 463 Mixed 414 SusWrite 330 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 49.7 176% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 299 226% 301 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 71GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 300 285 285 279 289 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 462 Mixed 411 SusWrite 276 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 47.2 170% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 296 224% 299 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 124%
ACTIONS USB DISK FOB 2.0 8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.3 3.7 4.6 4.4 3.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.02% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4 5% 4.95 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 5%
WD Elements 107C 5TB 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 84GB free, PID 107c SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 80 87 86 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 95 Write 97.3 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 80.1 110% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 332GB free, PID a202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 83 82 89 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 82 Write 81.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 81.4 90% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 49%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 474GB free, PID 1021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 31 30 31 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 37 Write 33.3 Mixed 28 SusWrite 30.4 43% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 22%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 44GB free, PID a007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 78 79 83 82 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 82.3 Write 82.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 79.4 90% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 44,086 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.7% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 20.3 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	363x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	223x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	111x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	99x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	29x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 8,026 samples	28x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16