Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180830
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '19 at 14:03
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$258 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 1,170 104% 883 Pts	64-Core 1,169 72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37A9) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	131% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 209 Parallax 224 132% 198 fps	MRender 240 Gravity 204 Splatting 133 151% 192 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU700 120GB 3,283 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 428a SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 37 48 49 40 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 440 Write 30.7 Mixed 136 SusWrite 45.2 35% 163 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 18.1 84% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 53.6 DQ Write 32.3 DQ Mixed 40.5 31% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 82%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$46 7,846 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 172GB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 156 167 167 168 170 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 121 Write 123 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 166 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C19 2x8GB 3,646 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.2% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.8 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 20 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $258Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,849x
Core i9-9900KIntel $427Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,704x
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,077x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	509x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	483x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	452x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	374x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	225x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	206x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $65Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $774

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16