Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181109
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '19 at 05:34
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 79.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 246 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 898 82% 688 Pts	64-Core 1299 80% 1299 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 63.4 53% 64.8 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 68.7 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 126 127 184 142 128 MB/s Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.4% Above average	Read 121 Write 84.8 Mixed 142 SusWrite 149 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 27.9 104% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 172 144% 202 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 354GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 118 117 118 119 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 103 Write 15 Mixed 33 SusWrite 116 49% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.5 209% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 296GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 178 177 178 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 174 Mixed 112 SusWrite 177 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 85GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 114 107 110 103 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 66 SusWrite 111 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 8GB free Firmware: JP1OA3FE SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 107 80 87 117 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 124 Write 124 Mixed 60 SusWrite 102 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 102GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 42 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 64.9 40% 53.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 92GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 39.3 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 40 48% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown=> F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.3% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.8 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 80.9 50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)