Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 47 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 89.1 36% 60.4 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 177 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2067) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 2.19 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 3.96 3% 3.22 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 466GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 377 381 318 305 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 378 Write 304 Mixed 308 SusWrite 342 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 39.5 126% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 278 209% 280 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 1x8GB 2,370 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	127x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	124x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	8x

RAM
99U5469-045.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 43%, 788 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	6x
99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 1,714 samples	5x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16