Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130910
Uptime	20.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3225-$325 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 59% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 143 58% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 204 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.57 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 2.56 3% 3.59 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 6.78 4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 3%
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 1.66 3% 3.31 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 679GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 287 321 301 311 328 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 324 Write 318 Mixed 295 SusWrite 307 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 28.1 95% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 37.5 DQ Write 97.2 DQ Mixed 50.7 44% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 133%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55 8,365 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 130GB free Firmware: SM12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 54 53 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 74.2 Write 73.3 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 52.8 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 63%
Maxtor 6B250S0 251GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 89GB free Firmware: BANC1G10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 64.3 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 60.4 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.3 151% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 135GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 52 53 53 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 54.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 52.7 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 1,027 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	89x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16