| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130326 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 04 '19 at 12:31 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 99% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
42.3%
Average
|
49% 80.2 Pts
|
16% 120 Pts
|
8% 134 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.3%
Very poor
|
4% 5.51 fps
|
50% 61.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 113 121 123 119 122 MB/s
|
30%
Poor
|
34% 150 MB/s
|
28% 8.9 MB/s
|
85% 138 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 102 104 103 103 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
66% 90.2 MB/s
|
154% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
129GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 119 120 117 117 MB/s
|
62.6%
Good
|
66% 91.2 MB/s
|
137% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
22.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.4 GB/s
|
20% 6.93 GB/s
|
35% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS3 Builds (Compare 319 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 31x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $88 |