Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 09:27
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 66.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 232 74% 137 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 724 73% 592 Pts	64-Core 935 58% 935 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 77.1 Parallax 66.7 60% 72.7 fps	MRender 66.8 Gravity 70.2 Splatting 73 58% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38 12,548 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1025F8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 368 437 432 453 454 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 468 Mixed 431 SusWrite 427 103% 457 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 33 128% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 257 202% 276 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 93%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 91 96 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 108 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 94.1 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 84%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 133 134 134 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 134 Write 122 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 133 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 96%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.9 8.4 7 8 8.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 20.3 Write 4.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 7.9 9% 8.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Mixed 0 44% 3.95 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB 2,863 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 20GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 16 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 27 Write 22.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 18.4 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 4.1 258% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 22%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.5 5.9 6.3 5.9 6.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	6.47% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 6.2 9% 8.48 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 36% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.47% Great: 10%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB 5,796 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 12 11 12 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.83% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 11.2 13% 13 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.83% Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 16GB 2,897 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 4GB free, PID 5599 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 11.5 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 9.3 19% 17 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.9 125% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.4% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 26.3 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 23 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)