Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 03:43
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 125 54% 88.1 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 338 29% 250 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.6 33% 36.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 37.3 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 131 130 121 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 390 Write 149 Mixed 209 SusWrite 128 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 24.6 87% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 93.7 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 116 84% 108 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 112 111 114 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 140 Mixed 71 SusWrite 111 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 168 170 169 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 134 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 169 89% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 185 185 186 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 152 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 185 97% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 59GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 122 128 128 128 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 160 Write 145 Mixed 40 SusWrite 126 85% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 107%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 5TB free Firmware: RT18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 171 171 174 171 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 107 Write 109 Mixed 33 SusWrite 170 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.8 279% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 769GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 136 136 136 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 133 Write 141 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 136 155% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 230% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.1 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16