Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170123
Uptime	9.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 01:01
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 170 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 503 52% 418 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 2.25 2% 11.7 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 4.78 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 138 138 131 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 382 Write 150 Mixed 172 SusWrite 139 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 20.4 95% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 152 114% 152 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 54GB free Firmware: GS2OA230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 70 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 90 Write 89.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 70.2 49% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB 1,006 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.1% Good	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 20.4 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 15.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	342x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	72x
Core i3-7100HIntelBench 56%, 141 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	246x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	107x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	64x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	22x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	14x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	27x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16